BJC Blog RSS Feeds
Home arrow Blog arrow NYTimes/CBS Poll Results on Health Care Coverage
NYTimes/CBS Poll Results on Health Care Coverage E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Tuesday, 13 March 2012

In a new NYTimes/CBS poll, conducted March 7-11, respondents were asked a few questions on the issue of health care coverage for female employees and employers' religious objections. Notably, when asked whether the debate on contraception coverage for female employees is more about religious freedom or women's health and rights, 37% picked religious freedom; 51% picked women's health. Sadly, the survey did not give "both" as an answer. Still, 6% volunteered that very reasonable response anyway.

Here are the full results (pdf):

73. Do you think health insurance plans for all employees should have to cover the full cost of birth control for their female employees, or should employers be allowed to opt out of covering that based on religious or moral objections?

Cover birth control 40
Allowed to opt out 51
Depends (vol.) 3
DK/NA 5

74. What about for religiously affiliated employers, such as a hospital or university? Do you think their health insurance plans for all employees should have to cover the full cost of birth control for their female employees, or should they be allowed to opt out of covering that based on religious or moral objections?

Cover birth control 36
Allowed to opt out 57
Depends (vol.) 2
DK/NA 5

76. Do you think the debate on this issue is more about religious freedom or more about women’s health and their rights?

Religious freedom 37
Women’s health/rights 51
Both (vol.) 6
DK/NA 6

 
 
Arizona Lawmakers Seek to Broaden State RFRA
Arizona's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) has been law for several years. The state's RFRA echoes the federal bill of the same name, requiring the government to demonstrate a compelling state interest to justify substantial burdens on religious exercise. Some lawmakers in Arizona ...
 
Florist Sues Washington AG Over Right to Discriminate
A florist who has been sued by Washington State's Attorney General over her refusal to provide services to a same-sex marriage has returned legal fire. Baronnelle Stutzman filed suit against the AG in response, alleging a violation of First Amendment rights. The counter suit, filed b...