BJC Blog RSS Feeds
Home arrow Blog
Blog from the Capital

Recent Editorials E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Monday, 27 March 2006
Against the proposed Missouri law that would name Christianity an official religion: Chuck Stanford in the Kansas City Star
A proposed resolution in the Missouri House (HCR 13) is so outrageous as to insult every resident of Missouri. It would mistakenly attempt to establish Christianity alone as the founding principle of our nation. This is a gross distortion of our history. In fact, the framers of the U.S. Constitution were trying to avoid the continual wars motivated by religious hatred that had plagued Europe. For that reason the framers of the Constitution decided that a church/state separation was their best assurance that the United States would remain relatively free of inter-religious strife.
Boston Globe remarks on the issue of religious freedom in Afghanistan
The NATO leaders know all too well the consequences if the government placed in power by US military intervention permits the execution of Abdul Rahman for exercising his right to freedom of religion: Homefront support for a continued NATO presence in Afghanistan would evaporate overnight.
In the NYTimes, Cardinal Roger Mahony defends his call to civil disobedience over the immigration bill now before the US Senate that would criminalize assistance to illegal immigrants.
Providing humanitarian assistance to those in need should not be made a crime, as the House bill decrees. As written, the proposed law is so broad that it would criminalize even minor acts of mercy like offering a meal or administering first aid. Current law does not require social service agencies to obtain evidence of legal status before rendering aid, nor should it. Denying aid to a fellow human being violates a law with a higher authority than Congress " the law of God.
 
Christian Convert in Afghanistan to Go Free? [UPDATED] E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Friday, 24 March 2006
CNN is reporting that Abdul Rahman, the Afghan who is threatened with execution for converting to Christianity, in apparent violation of the new Afghanistan Constitution, is "expected to be released in the coming days." Sounds like Secretary of State Rice is working the post-Taliban government pretty hard to avoid the tragic embarrassment of a state-sponsored execution for religious beliefs. Maybe a little work on the Constitution wouldn't hurt either. [UPDATE: AP reports: "A court on Sunday dismissed the case against an Afghan man facing possible execution for converting from Islam to Christianity, officials said, paving the way for his release."]
 
What She Said E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Friday, 24 March 2006
BJC Counsel Hollyn Hollman:
As we continue to fight efforts that damage religious freedom, we must affirm the principle that you should not have to pass a religious test to get a government-funded job. If you know of anyone who works in Head Start that should be involved in this issue, let us know. If you are a social service provider or member of the clergy, join our grassroots effort to prevent government-funded discrimination. Go to www.stopreligiousdiscrimination.org where social service providers and clergy can register their opposition to government-funded religious discrimination.
 
Friday Roundup E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Friday, 24 March 2006
Think Progress catches the White House trying to claim that religious freedom is guaranteed in the Afghani Constitution, when in fact it is not. Mainstream Baptist links to the text of a rip-roaring speech given by Bill Moyers in honor of a religious freedom scholarship created by James and Marilyn Dunn for the Wake Forest Divinity School. The Washington Post is trying to make the case that there's a war on Easter.
 
Biblical Literacy and the Georgia Classroom E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Thursday, 23 March 2006
Whether you're for it or against it, the next phase of constitutional debate regarding religion and public schools is undoubtedly the argument for biblical literacy. Quoted in the Atlanta Journal Constitution in an article about the role religion already plays in Georgia schools, Charles Haynes presents the most recent form of the argument, complete with a terrorism twist for good measure:
"We simply cannot graduate people into the world today who are ignorant about religion," said Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center, a Virginia-based group that advocates for improving the teaching of religion in public schools. "You would have thought we would have done more about it, given how important religion is these days. But I think post-9/11, we've woken up to this."
Most of the article refers to comparative religion classes, which are already considered constitutional. But, Georgia is on the verge of taking a step further, not simply religious literacy and awareness, but biblical literacy, using the Bible as the text.
Both Republicans and Democrats backed this year's measure to create two high school electives about the holy book and its influence on law, government, literature, art, music, history and culture. Supporters of Senate Bill 79, which passed the House 151-7 this week and is awaiting final approval in the Senate, say the classes are needed to ensure students understand the roots of American democracy or the inspiration for great works of art. But many of those lessons already are being taught in English and social studies classes. In Georgia, students learn the role religion played in historic events, such as the settlement of American colonies, and key facts about the translation of the Bible. As early as seventh grade, students learn the origins of Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the Middle East, as well as the division between Sunni and Shia Muslims. In high school, they read world literature textbooks that include selected works from the Torah, Bible and Quran.
If these things are taught effectively and appropriately in comparative religion, history and literature contexts, introducing many religions, why do we need a class solely on the Bible? And, especially, if developing some understanding in a post-September 11 world is one of the goals, wouldn't limiting the study to a single religious text pretty well defeat that purpose?
 
Navy Prayer Policy Revised E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Thursday, 23 March 2006
Washington Times
A new Navy policy that encourages chaplains to use only "nonsectarian" language outside of divine services has prompted criticism that regulating prayer services violates the chaplains' First Amendment rights. Under new rules signed by Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter, chaplains of all faiths in the Navy are asked to consider the views of their audience before invoking specific religious beliefs in prayer.
The new guidelines are said to be similar to those recently updated in the Air Force.
 
Federal Grants Enriching Religious Orgs. E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Wednesday, 22 March 2006
My personal organization skills are, to put it kindly, limited. Scattered is more like it. So, I'm not sure whether to file today's front-page Washington Post story about faith-based grants under "Duh!" or "I told you so." There are 2 primary bits of information: 1. The Bush Administration's unprecedented federal grants to religious organizations are being funnelled almost exclusively to political allies. 2. The influx of money has come to dominate the budgets of many once-small, once-humble faith-based groups/churches. What more can be said? Both revelations are damaging, both to our hope for a religion-neutral government, and to the church's goal to be beholden to nobody, and nothing, other than its godly mission. And the path here has been nothing if not predictable. Our government has taken it upon itself to enrich some churches and religious organizations and not others. Could there be any question that the faith-based funding process and the dark side of American politics would end up dirty dancing together? So, now let's look forward, because this dance has more unfortunate moves left. The Administration claims, of course, that politics played no role in determining grants. But they are not the sole determiner of that sin. Even if they are to be believed--that they gave no forethought to the political advantages of funding great increases in the budgets of like-minded church organizations--imagine you are the director of a small faith-based service provider. Now imagine that your budget has grown more than ten-fold in recent years thanks to a rush of government money. Maybe even your own salary has increased greatly? And the 2006 or 2008 elections come upon you, and you realize...if there's a sea-change in the political landscape, my funding could come to a grinding halt! It's a church-state nightmare, a disaster to the integrity of the church, whose very survival becomes dependent on an electoral outcome. Faith-based government funding isn't just bad for the groups that are left out for their politics or ideology or whatever reason. It's also bad for the recipient of that funding in their pursuit of doing the work churches are called to do. When your very existence as an organization is dependent on the charity of government, the political system has you right where they want you. And that's never a good place to be. If you don't want your tax money going to religious groups you don't agree with, you shouldn't want it going to religious groups that do. The Interfaith Alliance has been joined by the Baptist Joint Committee in filing a response to this story.
 
Judge Jones Discusses Intelligent Design Decision E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Wednesday, 22 March 2006
Must be Audio Wednesday today. First I link to an NPR story and now this. But it's too good to pass up. Philadelphia's WHYY has a talk radio show, "Radio Times" that today featured a discussion with Judge John Jones, the US District Judge who ruled against Dover, PA in the Intelligent Design case earlier this year. Via How Appealing. I'll post transcripts of any juicy bits later as I have time to listen.
 
GA to Teach High School Bible Classes E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Wednesday, 22 March 2006
NPR's Emily Kopp, on Morning Edition, reports on the expected passage of a bill in Georgia that would authorize the teaching of a Bible literacy class in public high schools, using the Bible itself as the text.
 
"American Theocracy" E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Tuesday, 21 March 2006
When was the last time a political/historical book made such a splash as Kevin Phillips' American Theocracy? I expect to see liberal blogs touting a book from a Republican criticizing the current direction of his Party and the country. But an entire week of attention has propelled this book onto the front burner of the "mainstream media" as well. President Bush was even asked about it at a recent (shockingly) unscripted Q&A with the public. NPR has reprinted a significant excerpt, a chapter on Religion. It's worth a read. Phillips also explains his basic premise at TPMCafe here.
 
Results 3655 - 3668 of 3896
 
Arizona Senate Passes Changes to RFRA, Sends to Governor
I posted earlier about the Arizona bill making its way through the legislature that would broaden the free exercise protections in the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Among other changes, the bill would allow plaintiffs to bring suit for "potential violations." Here&...
 
Is the Endorsement Test on the Chopping Block?
The Supreme Court's decision earlier this week to take up the issue of legislative prayer for the first time in 30 years leaves many questions about the future of the government prayer balance. Veteran reporter Lyle Deniston considers what this decision likely means in a new essay for Constit...