BJC Blog RSS Feeds
Home arrow Blog arrow Judge: Idaho Public Charter School Has No Right to Teach the Bible
Judge: Idaho Public Charter School Has No Right to Teach the Bible E-mail
Written by Don Byrd   
Thursday, 20 May 2010

A federal judge in Idaho has ruled against the Nampa Classical Academy in its efforts to teach the Bible as a primary text in its curriculum. Nampa is a charter school - privately run but publicly funded - that filed suit after the state's education commission disallowed such a use of religious text. In his ruling, Judge Edward Lodge rightly swatted down the argument that the school and its teachers have a First Amendment right to select its own texts. Instead, he emphasized, the curriculum - and the speech it represents - belongs to the government, which represents and has responsibilities toward all citizens:

Plaintiffs’ arguments attempt to expand the First Amendment rights of expression and religion in a manner that would allow religion into the curriculum of public schools. Plaintiffs have provided no authority to support this argument. In fact, just the opposite is true. Students and teachers do not have a “First Amendment right to influence curriculum as they so choose.” The curriculum taught in public schools is government speech... As the speaker, Defendants have control over the content of their speech and expressions. Were the Plaintiffs operating a private school, their arguments would be correct as they, not the state, would be the speaker and in control of the content of their speech. Here, however, the Plaintiffs are a public charter school which accepts public funds and is organized by, and subject to the same laws as any other public school.

And Judge Lodge goes even further, asserting:

If the Defendants allowed the Plaintiffs’ proposed curriculum, they would be in violation of the Establishment Clause.

 
 
Arizona Senate Passes Changes to RFRA, Sends to Governor
I posted earlier about the Arizona bill making its way through the legislature that would broaden the free exercise protections in the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Among other changes, the bill would allow plaintiffs to bring suit for "potential violations." Here&...
 
Is the Endorsement Test on the Chopping Block?
The Supreme Court's decision earlier this week to take up the issue of legislative prayer for the first time in 30 years leaves many questions about the future of the government prayer balance. Veteran reporter Lyle Deniston considers what this decision likely means in a new essay for Constit...