Democrats Highlight Faith in Convention, I Offer Some Guidelines
I'm keeping an eye on the DNC Convention in Denver, just getting under way. A key theme in coverage of the event has been the role of faith and religion in this 4-day national commercial for the Democratic Party and its presidential nominee.
This sort of thing is, I suppose, to be expected these days and in some respects there's nothing wrong with it. The conventions are political party events, not government functions, so opening with prayers or with an interfaith gathering is not (perhaps technically) a church-state problem. Still, the spirit of church-state separation and our national commitment to respecting Americans of all faiths, and of no faith, calls out for some principled restraint. So, as a bit of unsolicited advice, here are some principles - rules of engagement, as it were - I wouldn't mind seeing remembered as both parties make their case to voters.
1. Being religious is not in itself a qualification for office. The Constitution of course forbids any religious test. But beyond that, religion should not be used as a surrogate for discussion of important policy matters. Outward displays of faith neither confirm nor deny sound policy judgment or strong leadership skills.
2. A religious belief can be - and is - held by a wide diversity of political views, and a political view can be - and is - held by a wide diversity of religious beliefs. Politicians and activists do religion a great disservice when they presume to speak for all people of faith.
3. Religious leaders who participate in convention activities are taking a risk. Their very presence can send a signal of endorsement. That is ok as a private citizen, but the more they are perceived to act as a representative of the non-profit organization they lead, the more afoul they run of IRS rules prohibiting campaign activity. So, giving an opening prayer is one thing. Making a statement of support from the convention podium is another. And broadcasting a statement of support over the jumbo-tron filmed in your sanctuary with your church choir backing you is something else altogether.
4. I know it's a political campaign, but can we keep the religious pandering to a dull roar? Using religion divisively as either the carrot or the stick of an electoral strategy is demeaning to religion, it cheapens faith, and it distracts from important issues our political leaders should face head on.
[UPDATE: At Religion Clause, Howard Friedman asks some probing questions and provides a fascinating history lesson that problematizes my assumption that political conventions are not government functions, hence out of reach of church-state law. An important read!]